- Unity: The Restoration Movement began as a unity movement. The desire was to unite Christians of all denominations in one body that could work and worship together. Denominational divisions made that unity difficult, we needed to leave behind those loyalties and see unity as “our polar star.” (Barton W. Stone)
- Restoration: We saw the restoration of simple, congregational, non-denominational Christianity as the key to unity. If creeds and confessions separated believers, we would set them aside. We would go “Back to the Bible” and just be “Christians Only” who would “Speak where Bible speaks and be silent here it is silent.” The slogans were easy, but focusing on truth while maintaining unity wasn't so much!
In our reading today in Romans 14, Paul deals with how to deal with disagreements about how to do faith while maintaining unity. If there is a lesson that the church needs to learn today, it is this lesson of unity despite differences. The issues discussed in the church at Rome seem minor to us-- eating meats and observing special days. But these issues went to the very heart of the differences between Jewish and Roman Christians in a world divided. If we can’t find some more modern issues that fit Paul’s template here, then we just aren’t trying hard enough. Paul says four basic things about dealing with basic differences in the church--
- First, accept others without looking down on them (14:3). We don’t have to agree on all the issues—in fact, we can’t agree. Would Jewish and Roman Christians ever see all food issues exactly alike? Will high-church Presbyterians and happy-clappy Pentecostals ever view worship the same? We will never agree. Ever! But we must respect one another’s faith! Always! We will never really “accept one another” until we can learn to “respect one another.”
- Second, refuse to judge the motives of those who disagree with you (14:6). Even if we disagree on issues, we can share motivation to glorify God. We can fuss and feud about our preferred styles of church music… or we can thank God for our a mutual desire to praise Him! We must get much better job at looking past our issues to our motives. What we tend to do is impugn the motives of those who disagree with us. It’s too easy to dismiss someone with, “You would think that, you Bible-hating liberal!” Paul here assumes that our differences arise from a mutual love of God! We’ll get better at this church thing when we are grateful for the faith of people with whom we disagree on the details.
- Third, give up trying to CONTROL others (Rom 14:22). Why does Paul tell Timothy to stay away from “foolish and stupid arguments?” (2 Tim 2:23). It wasn’t that Timothy didn't enjoy a good tussle ever now-and-again; it was because he enjoyed it too much! That the "evil desires of youth" Paul warns against in 2:22! To constantly argue over issues only serves to drive wedges between us. There is a time to patiently study difficult issues and share our findings with others. We need to be better at that! There’s also time to treasure our beliefs and our liberty and keep them both to ourselves! Paul defends our right to private beliefs, but he wants them to stay that way!
- Fourth, we love each other MORE than we love getting our way! (14:15). The point of church is to help us get to heaven—not to make it harder! Paul says that his freedom to eat meat means that he is also free NOT to eat meat. Does that mean that UNITY more important than TRUTH? Well, maybe not… but it’s more important than me getting my way on what I see to be the truth on an issue that may or may not be all that important in the grand scheme of things. And frankly, those are the issues that have divided our churches.
It’s kinda funny when you look at it that way, isn't it? No, it’s not funny at all!
3 comments:
I remember growing up in the 60's and 70's being taught that denominations had the same bible we had but intentionally choose to disregard it to deceive people. I also remember how wrong i thought that was because my friends and their families that did not go to the same church i did were honest believers in Christ. Wanting to be "right" and believing what i was being taught was scriptural truth made me have a bad attitude toward these other church people and do some things I've been ashamed of ever since.
When a kid can even see the unloving attitude we had at our church towards other churches it had to be really bad.
I am so thankful to God for his mercy, forgiveness and patience.
So how far do we carry Romans 14? I assume we don't bring Muslims, Buddists, Hindus, etc. into the fellowship of the church without belief in Jesus. Do we fellowship those who refuse to accept the virgin birth of Jesus? What about those who teach that baptism is not essential to ones salvation and have not been baptized for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38)?
Certainly we must approach these people with the correct attitudes expressed in Romans 14 but does Romans 14 provide a cover for all these differences? If not, then at what level do we apply Romans 14?
It seems that the issues in Romans 14 are those in which the doing or not doing of a particular thing is neither right or wrong. Can we stuff all differences into Romans 14 or is it limited?
Thanks.
Bill,
Read Romans 14 alongside Acts 15 and the issues becomes a bit sharper. The question was "How do Christians separate themselves from idols?" The first Gentile Christians were told "Don't eat meats offered to idols... period." By the time Romans and 1 Cor were written, meats offered to idols had become left the the discretion of individual Christians. The issue of "keep yourself from idols" was still a salvation issue; the how was left up to individual believers.
How far do we carry Romans 14? To everyone who will stand at the foot of the cross.
Post a Comment