Friday, October 05, 2007

I Will Sing of You Among the People

I ran across a long discussion yesterday on Mike Cope’s blog on instrumental music and our a cappella worship tradition. I won’t try to reconstruct the conversation. But I also ran across a website that was an affirmation of belief in a cappella only worship music. I won’t try to reconstruct that conversation either. But I did spend some time reading through some of the comments made on both web sites. Now my personal history in our heritage only goes back about 5 generations, but I guess there is something about this whole thing that I just don’t get.

Oh, I get the part about the richness of our cappella tradition. And I get the part about the beauty of human voices blending together in harmony. I can’t do it, but I do get it. (Wasn’t harmony made up about the same time and by the same people who made up the instruments in the church thing? Wouldn’t singing in unison be more theologically significant than 4-part harmonies going off in different directions at once? But then I digress.) And I get the part about the danger of turning participatory worship into a presentation or entertainment where the audience becomes only casual observer. (Though the temptation to “show off’ for the benefit of others is just as real for the guy singing tenor as for soloist or guy playing acoustic guitar). And I do get the beauty and simplicity of a cappella, congregational worship. As one of the praise songs that we sing begins, “There’s no place else that I’d rather be…” I have zero desire to change our a cappella worship music tradition. Zero as it none!

But what I do not get is the idea that heaven and hell rests on whether or not you get why you shouldn't use instruments. There are 17 verses in the New Testament that mention singing. Five of those are from Revelation (like the faithful holding harps of God and singing the song of Moses and the Lamb, Rev 15:2). Five are quotations from the Old Testament. Most of the rest simply say that someone (Jesus and the disciples, Paul and Silas, etc.) sang. There are no examples of singing in a church worship setting, except for 1 Corinthians 14:26, which sounds more like someone presenting a song solo, not congregational singing. The two texts we discuss the most (Eph 5:19 and Col 3:16) are not even in contexts discussing corporate worship at all—they are discussing personal spiritual living. We are a little short on data to know exactly how God wants us sing praises.

Even if I'm right in deciding that a cappella singing best fits the New Testament data (and I always think I’m right), can’t I at least admit that there really is a bit ambiguity here? Can’t I be comfortable in the choice that I make each Sunday while respecting brothers and sisters down the street who make a different choices? But since the data is ambiguous, should we not take the safest choice and sing sans the piano? Maybe. Or maybe we should say, “You know, there is ambiguity in what the New Testament says about church music, so let’s go back and see what clues God gives us about praise in the Old Testament.

I don’t want to change our church music. I think there needs to be an a cappella music tradition in the kingdom of God, and I think we’re in a good position to help out there! But what we need to lose is the idea that God moved heaven and earth to send His Son to die on the cross to take captivity captive and make a public spectacle of the powers and authorities … only to see most Christians go to hell because they missed the fine print (or the absence of a fine print) about pianos and organs. If we think that faithfulness and salvation depends on us figuring everything out correctly-- or that we can have no fellowship with anyone who figures things out wrongly-- then we are doomed to spend the rest of our church lives arguing over praise teams, children’s classes, Bible translations and whether we can eat in the church building. I would like to think that there is room in our churches for those of us who really do prefer singing a cappella praise…. but who really don't think it is such a big hairy deal when someone else doesn't.

I met last night with a couple who are placing membership with us. They came to us from a background that uses instruments. They said that they had some reservations about coming to a church that doesn’t have music because they really enjoy that, but then said, “I was ashamed that I had worried about that because the singing here is so beautiful and worshipful.” That's the point, right? At that moment my phone rang—my ring-tone is the chorus of Philip, Craig and Dean’s worship anthem, “You are God alone. From before time began You are on Your throne. You are God alone.” That’s is the point, isn't it?

10 comments:

same said...

What's the point / all these word?

Tuck said...

Point? I'm supposed to have a point? ;-)

Clifford said...

Unfortunately we as Churches of Christ do have an exclusionary reputation. I once told someone my Church Name and the response was, “Oh you all are the Church that think that you are the only ones going to heaven.” That’s the danger in trying to dictate the correct way in some sort of absolute manner. We can easily slip into the error of the Pharisees and become self righteous condemners of those that don’t see it the way we see it. The sad part is that we see “dis-fellowship” with brothers and sisters because of the huge mountains of separation we create from these issues. This has to be completely contradictory to the greatest commandments according to Jesus, to love God and your brother. If we obey these principles in the Grace of God and our Lord Jesus Christ, praise teams, instruments, a cappella, etc. will become more trivial. Not only do we condemn our brothers and sisters, but we often condemn those of our brothers and sisters that express acceptance instead of condemnation. God sees our hearts in spite of our sins. We need to see our brothers and sisters the way God does, in spite of our preferences. Paul preached unity amongst Pagans and Jews. Can we not have unity amongst instrumental and a cappella Christians? In John 5:27 God reminds us that Jesus has the authority to investigate the actions and thoughts of the life; and all the "moral right" or authority to sit in judgment on the creatures of God, and to pronounce their doom. No man has that authority no matter what he thinks of others style of worship, or the validity of his own.

same said...

The four direction thing argument falls short; as a flock of bird flies together or a school of fish swimming in different directions but swimming or flying as one in harmony (in parallel with one purpose if you will) but each one supporting the other they all survive. . . am I making any since thus far? Shall I continue with this explanation?

same said...

Oh! I agree with clifford and I think I should add sin could hide our face from God but if we ask him in hummilty and with repentant heart his so has alresdy washed us and he can always see the heart and mind of his children mud or not and he sees every evil thing and puts it far from him does he not do as he says (he does not lie and gives mercy to those who give it to others)

same said...

What I don’t get is this. . how children are not allowed to listen to good music (beautiful music), because it is accompanied with instruments, that could be called ”praise music” in the car but they can hand you a disk of nasty wordily music and their parents are “ok” with that! The nasty music had instruments too!

same said...

If one person in the car is offended don’t do it and if any one outside the car is offended don’t do it and don’t eat a bunch of meet offered to idles or not before a long car ride or church service.

Tuck said...

I do get the point, Sam. But then if the birds fly around too much in different directions at the same time, they tend to crash into each other... like when I try to sing tenor! ;-) The real problem (as Clifford points out) is when the birds try to fly while while criticizing how the other birds are flying or condemning other birds for not being in the one true flock. I remember my wife's response when Angelynn (our youngest) tattled on Tressa (our oldest) for not cling her eyes during our meal-time prayer, "If you were praying to God, you wouldn't be looking at Tressa." That about sums up the worship wars, I think. Ken Young writes

Let us keep our eyes on Jesus
And tell others there's a way
To return with Him to heaven
When He comes that final day
We are children of the heavens

same said...

Thanks to you all, Keep locking up and don’t get caught looking at those who aren’t looking at you or just all keep your spiritual eyes open and close your own eyes if you must, (if you trust every body in the room it’s a lot easier to do) that applies to many things. Thank God birds and fish can talk without arguing, they will never know true love and there flesh and (well they don’t have one of those that could be lost) I wonder if we will remember the good stuff about them or if we will know all those mysteries that are hidden among his creations when we are in Heaven.

same said...

It is sometimes the case that those children who come from the worst environment have the best character, intestinal fortitude and ability to read between the lines. Being tried by the fires of the world they have God given strengths that can shine through if used for good. This is most always precipitated by mentors who take the wounded under their wings and nurture the soul. The one who is like a young tree struggling and damaged is sending down roots searching out any available nutrients. Is it being chocked out and covered with parasites? It springs back to life when the rain begins to fall, the proper environment is provided and separation of those doing harm will help in the recovery. It will take some time but the wounds can be healed and there are those who are in need of ‘being needed’ they, should not be overlocked.